Insurer Saves on photocopier Header Image

Insurer Saves on photocopier

Accreditation Agricultural apple Assess & Inspect AV Average fee Average savings Benefits Best validation reference point Beyond all reasonable doubt Care Catastrophic event CATS trade status Claim Lifecycle Claims handlers Claim spend savings Commercial technology Comparable sale quotes Computer Equipment cost Covid-19 Customer Satisfaction Damage Dedicated Consultant Diggers Drones Dual instruction Easy Easy to reach Efficient Electrical damage Empathy Engineers EPOS Exceed expectations Experience Fire Flood Fraud Fridge Good service Great service High Net Worth Incumbent Suppliers Informative Installation insurance Insurance Insurance companies Insurance fraud iphone iPhone iphone 15 iPhone 15 Knowledgeable KPI Laptops Lawn Mower Lift Looking after policyholders Macbook Major & Complex loss Manufacturer Relationship Microsoft Milling Machine Minimising Claim Spend Minimising stress Negotiation No more comparable sale prices Obscure Technology Obsolete technology Old technology Overspend Pandemic PCs phones Photocopier policyholder Policyholder Positioning Cats Positive Claims journey Positive feedback Positive Outcomes Pre-incident condition Printing Professional Project management Projector Questions Quick Quotes Recommended Recovering files Reducing Cost Repair repairs Replacement Retail Retrieval Reviews Samsung Savings Servers Service Value Settlement Speakers Speed Storm Sunbeds Surveying Equipment Swiftness Sympathy Taking ownership Technology Technology Claims Time Time Saving Training TV Types of Fraud Updated Validation Visual Equipment Vulnerable Why CATS Workshop
An incumbent supplier of the policyholder quoted £26,655.86 on a replacement photocopier and were insistent that the replacement had to be supplied by them and at that price.

After being informed of CATS trade status and CATS review of the T's & C's, the incumbent supplier of the policyholder agreed to match CATS's lesser replacement value of £15,285.40.

Claim spend was reduced by £11,370.46 or 43% through CATS validation involvement 

Back to News